Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 04:53

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Exclusive | Kimberly-Clark Nears Roughly $3.5 Billion Sale of International Tissue Business - WSJ
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Former MLB Star Suffers Serious Injury in Savannah Bananas Game - Sports Illustrated
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Michigan International Speedway weekend schedule, TV info for NASCAR Cup, Truck, ARCA - NBC Sports
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What should you answer when someone says to you in French, "au plaisir de vous revoir"?
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Off-the-shelf stem cell therapy for type 1 diabetes continues to show positive results - STAT
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Health officials warn of measles case from traveler at Dulles Airport - The Washington Post